Order allow,deny
Deny from all
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
DirectoryIndex index.php
RewriteRule ^index.php$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /index.php [L]
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
DirectoryIndex index.php
RewriteRule ^index.php$ - [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule . /index.php [L]
[css-view-transitions-1] Is "named elements" map in the right order after "capture new state" algorithm? · Issue #9672 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If namedElements[transitionName] does not exist, then set namedElements[transitionName] to a new captured element struct.
However, it doesn't mention where to insert the element, which means by default we would be adding it at the end of the ordered map. It is the more convenient default to implement, but is this correct? You might expect to want to preserve the paint order or such (slightly more of a pain to do, but possible)